Labor’s Negative Gearing Policy

In what can only be described as homicidal economic science, Bill Shorten and Labor want to eradicate all negative gearing, except for new home constructions and reduce the capital gains tax discount from 50% to 25% (applying to assets held for more than a year). To make things really explosive, Shorten also announced that none of the changes would apply to properties purchased before July 2017.

Apparently, Shorten thinks this will solve the housing affordability ‘crisis’ while giving the government an extra $3 billion a year to play with. In other words, nowhere near enough money to solve the budget catastrophe but plenty enough to wreak havoc on everyday people’s lives and create complete uncertainty in the economy.

Nobody can accurately predict what this policy would result in. There are simply too many crazy and contrasting variables being slammed into each other. Of course, this then begs the obvious question: why would anyone want to do this? When you look through some of the basic consequences of the policy, the answer becomes clear.

Firstly, there would be the strong possibility of an immediate and artificial housing boom/bubble as people stomp over their grandmothers’ graves to get ‘lifetime negative gearing’ on pre-July 2017 properties. On this point, I wonder if Shorten has even considered the possibility of people perpetually refinancing their pre-2017 properties until they die and using the funds for other investments – i.e. keeping their pre-2017 properties permanently geared to the maximum amount possible as they rise in value over time. Let’s hold that thought for a moment…

Then, once the magic date hits in July 2017:

  • There would be a clutch of people who have just bought or still own pre- July 2017 properties and won’t sell even if you put a gun to their heads. This would especially be the case if:
    • they have bought high during an artificial boom which then quickly deflates somewhere around July 2017; or
    • THEY ARE ALLOWED TO KEEP REFINANCING THE **** OUT OF THESE PROPERTIES UNTIL THEY DIE.
  • With the property pupu platter that’s left over, there would be twin mixed government price signals: one creating lower investment demand for established housing, and another encouraging increased investor demand for building new homes.
  • Demand for building services would increase, driving up building costs (which are already insane). Aside from screwing over investors, this will make it even more difficult for ‘working’ families to build their own dream homes.
  • Last, but not least, all the extra building activity would create plenty of fat for construction unions to chew on. Mmm, delicious.

And finally we arrive at the likely heart of Shorten and Labor’s motivation (NB: any time Labor comes up with a policy that defies all common sense, just think to yourself ‘how would this help unions ‘procure’ more money’ – then all will become clear).

If the Liberals had any brains, they would zero in on this policy and make a much bigger election issue out of it.

 


(*) The substance of the above material was initially published within another post on The Marcus Review on 18 February 2016. Given the significance of this issue, this material now has its own dedicated post.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Labor’s Negative Gearing Policy”

  1. Initially there may be a rush to invest – secured NG for a decade – what could go wrong. However, post this bloom reality sets in – 35% of the established residential market (investors) has been excised from future investors…prices fall…cap gains diminish…pressure on high leverage interest only loans (~40-50% or more of investor loans) builds…rush to exit? unintended consequences. Which sounds very like Labor.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Marcus, the more interesting side to this story that people like you and a very few others are being left to do all of the heavy lifting to warn of the dangers. The LNP has nobody capable of cutting through the media haze with enough credibility to counter the ALP’s policy pitch. Wasn’t the electorate assured we would get better communication around matters economic when we were last ponied-up a new PM?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. A great point RB. The LNP’s complete inability to fight on issues like this is of deep concern. In my view, Abbott also lacked the necessary vigour while he was PM. Turnbull of course is a joke – his only strategy is to make as little noise as possible and not rock the boat. The media’s failure to do any proper thinking or research is also a disgrace.

      To think, if Julia Gillard had her way, bloggers like me would have to be ‘registered’ and have their content ‘assessed’ for suitability.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s